Publisher |
N/A
|
Source | Web of Science |
Volume / Issue | 115 |
Pages | 21-Nov |
Total Pages |
N/A
|
Article Link |
N/A
|
PDF Link | http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0921800913002498/1-s2.0-S0921800913002498-main.pdf?_tid=168729d0-536e-11e6-a511-00000aacb361&acdnat=1469564477_daf41ff2f1cbb36076d02170172b8f19 |
ISBN |
N/A
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009 |
Editor(s) |
N/A
|
Conference / Book Title |
N/A
|
Flag |
N/A
|
Tags |
N/A
|
Other |
N/A
|
Conference Title |
N/A
|
Conference Date |
N/A
|
Publication Date | 15-Jul |
Article Date |
N/A
|
GS Citation |
N/A
|
Abstract | While there have been rapid advances in assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), a critical remaining challenge is how to move from scientific knowledge to real-world decision making. We offer 6 lessons from our experiences applying new approaches and tools for quantifying BES in 20 pilot demonstrations: (1) Applying a BES approach is most effective in leading to policy change as part of an iterative science-policy process; (2) simple ecological production function models have been useful in a diverse set of decision contexts, across a broad range of biophysical, social, and governance systems. Key limitations of simple models arise at very small scales, and in predicting specific future BES values; (3) training local experts in the approaches and tools is important for building local capacity, ownership, trust, and long-term success; (4) decision makers and stakeholders prefer to use a variety of BES value metrics, not only monetary values; (5) an important science gap exists in linking changes in BES to changes in livelihoods, health, cultural values, and other metrics of human wellbeing; and (6) communicating uncertainty in useful and transparent ways remains challenging. |
Created: 12/14/2017 10:30 AM (ET)
Modified: 12/14/2017 10:30 AM (ET)