Latest On The Conservation Gateway

A well-managed and operational Conservation Gateway is in our future! Marketing, Conservation, and Science have partnered on a plan to rebuild the Gateway into the organization’s enterprise content management system (AEM), with a planned launch of a minimal viable product in late 2024. If you’re interested in learning more about the project, reach out to megan.sheehan@tnc.org for more info!

Welcome to Conservation Gateway

The Gateway is for the conservation practitioner, scientist and decision-maker. Here we share the best and most up-to-date information we use to inform our work at The Nature Conservancy.

Southern Blue Ridge: Core Forest Delineation


​​
Downloads
 

 
Southern Blue Ridge priority conservation areas were identified by The Nature Conservancy through an analysis of matrix forests which identified 83 large blocks that are relatively unfragmented forest (Anderson et al. 2013).  In this analysis a matrix forest was defined as a large area (greater than or equal to 15,000 acres) of heterogeneous, relatively undeveloped forested areas (i.e. areas containing at least 80% deciduous forest, evergreen forest, or forest scrub).  These forests are considered to be large enough to be resistant to the effects of catastrophic events (i.e. hurricanes, tornadoes, ice storms) and resilient enough to return to a positive state of ecological productivity and species composition following disturbances (Anderson and Bernstein 2003). The boundary of each block was delineated by any major fragmenting feature (interstates, railroads, large lakes, etc.). These blocks were then prioritized across the SBR to identify which matrix forest blocks best represented a range of ecological land units (ELU). These ELUs contain combinations of elevation, bedrock geology, and land forms that make them each unique, however some matrix forests are more similar to some than to others. These characteristics create a wide range of environmental conditions often correlated with high biodiversity. Thus through conservation of a wide array of large forest blocks, a wide range of biodiversity will be supported, and it will maintain or improve ecosystem function as changes within the environment occur, including climate disruption. 
 
While these matrix forest blocks are relatively undeveloped, they do contain elements of multiple-use landscapes. The concern with multiple-use landscapes in these areas is that these blocks could contain minor fragmenting features or be managed in such a way that might not support biodiversity (i.e. extraction). These minor fragmenting features are defined as features such as minor roads (county, Forest Service, logging etc.), motorized recreation trails or other landscape features that could impede movement of organisms across the matrix block or downsize habitat. To meet the habitat needs of SBR organisms it is necessary to identify and evaluate unfragmented core forests that will reside within priority matrix forests to be managed for biodiversity.
The goal of this report is to build upon previous analysis of SBR matrix forest blocks using aerial photography and geospatial analysis to identify core forests within each of these blocks.  A core forest is defined as a heterogeneous landscape with minimal (i.e. hiking trails) or no fragmenting features that contain at least 5,000 acre interior forest surrounded by a 100m buffer. The buffer is a part of the core forest which surrounds and protects the 5,000 acre (or larger) interior forest from any multiple-use disturbances (such as off road vehicle trails) that may take place in the matrix forest block. Core forests are a key component in the long-term SBR conservation strategy as they “provide the opportunity for relatively natural processes to occur or be mimicked through management, resulting in a healthy range of structural and compositional forest attributes” (Anderson et al. 2013).  
 
The accompanying report summarizes the five step delineation of core forests involving:
     1. Identify minor (or multiple use) fragmenting features in forest matrix blocks.
     2. Delineate core forests that do not contain minor fragmenting features.
     3. Document current land owner and management of core forests.
     4. Calculate and evaluate core forests based on density of minimally fragmenting features, shape index values, and
         biodiversity potential.
     5. Use aerial photographs to review core forests identified by GIS software to look for any mistakes made in land
         cover classification.
 
This study identified 200 potential core forests within the SBR intended to be used by TNC and its partners to further refine the ecoregion’s conservation strategies. It is estimated that these 200 core forests account for 2,875,373 acres of land. More specifically 57% of the total land within matrix forest blocks was identified as core forest. Additionally, all but five of the 83 matrix forest blocks contained at least one core forest. These promising results are meant to guide TNC and its partners in conserving a diverse forest network for long-term biodiversity protection through informing land acquisition, forest management, and monitoring. More specifically, within the SBR, Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests are currently undergoing Land & Resource Management Plan revision which could incorporate protection of significant core forests in the new plan.  The identification of a forest matrix network with embedded core forests is a key component in long term preservation of ecosystem processes within Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests and throughout the SBR (Anderson 2008).

*ArcGIS map package updated May 2015 to include core forest air truthing of GA, SC, and NC .
**A webinar was held on June 4, 2013 to explain this report's findings. The presentation is approximately 1 hour long; however, there is a brief technical difficulty recorded from ~8:00-12:00. Please feel free to fast forward this section.
 
Contact: Megan Sutton, Southern Blue Ridge Program Director, The Nature Conservancy - North Carolina Chapter, 828-350-1431
 
Citation: Albritton, R. (eds. D. Ray and M. Sutton). 2013. Southern Blue Ridge: Core and Interior Forest Delineation. The Nature Conservancy. pp. 36. https://www.conservationgateway.org/Files/Pages/Southern_Blue_Ridge_Core_and_Interior_Forest_Delineation.aspx.
GO BACK »